by DKCiccone on Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:10 am
Thanks,Torill, for encouraging ISECN members to participate in this discussion.
I think that establishing a code of ethics is a worthwhile exercise to prevent 'recreating the wheel' every time ethical dilemmas arise in the field. This may be obvious, but I do also think that in drafting such a code we ought to be sensitive to the limitations health promoters often face as a result of the political, cultural or financial context of their work. We ought to hold ourselves to promoting the equitable distribution of resources and supporting the most marginalized as best we can, but when other bodies/powers are holding the reins how can we be effective in demanding a contrary course of action more in line with our ethics? Also, it is oftentimes difficult to determine at the time a project is implemented, what the real long term impact will be to the community as a whole. It would be great if at some point down the line (pie in the sky, I know) there could be some sort of centralized ethical review board to keep a record of successful projects and lessons learned to help us collectively move forward as professionals.
Obviously, in a more general sense, we want to be building capacity within communities to help them gain empowerment over their own health. In my head I imagine that an ethical code will be written from this perspective; such that not just the ethics of our daily actions, but also our long term impact, are emphasized.